tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1454051731189268002.post6463855240818379828..comments2024-03-27T11:29:23.559-03:00Comments on Sufficient Description: What Does “For” Mean?Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1454051731189268002.post-76209007748517996632022-03-24T09:46:25.441-03:002022-03-24T09:46:25.441-03:00Thanks for pointing that out!!Thanks for pointing that out!!Normanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17573687140337856397noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1454051731189268002.post-71917587533366903142022-03-23T20:03:43.670-03:002022-03-23T20:03:43.670-03:00Interesting thoughts on the meaning of "for&q...Interesting thoughts on the meaning of "for" in patent claims, although I fear that there will always be a squabble in court on the point. Anyway, for what it is worth, the UK Supreme Court in Warner Lambert v Generics (Mylan) & Actavis (Pregabalin/Lyrica),[2018] UKSC 56, completely agrees with your interpretation, see for instance paragraph 67. Peter Ghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03352686204387152116noreply@blogger.com